At our August 11 meeting, Pflugerville City Council decided not to call a bond election for November.

That decision does not mean the proposed projects are unimportant. It means we should not ask residents to authorize more debt before the projects are clearly defined and before we have a responsible plan for fitting them alongside the major work already underway.

Pflugerville is in the middle of significant investments in water and wastewater infrastructure, roads, parks, and public facilities. Those projects carry long-term costs. A bond election should begin with a clear public case: what we need, what it will cost, when it can be delivered, and what the effect will be on taxpayers. We were not there yet. Staff did a great job developing reasonable projects that do need funding; this just isn't the year to ask our residents to contribute more.

The animal shelter needs action. And a real plan

The animal shelter was the most urgent part of the discussion. Pflugerville needs a new shelter. The existing facility does not meet the community's long-term needs, and postponing planning indefinitely is not acceptable.

But urgency is not a substitute for a defined project. Council had several possible scenarios in front of us, with important questions still unresolved about scope, location, operating model, cost, and timing. Asking voters to approve a large bond before those questions are answered would put the decision in the wrong order. The resident Bond Committee that met earlier this year had similar questions, and those still haven't been answered.

Staff worked hard to put together options for the bond proposal, and Council instead gave staff direction on which scenarios should receive more work. That allows us to develop a credible proposal and return to residents with more than a broad promise and a price range.

Restraint is part of planning

The proposed FY 2027 budget already asks Council to make difficult choices. It uses the voter-approval tax rate—the highest rate the City can adopt without an election—while reducing the number of funded positions by 12 and maintaining core services and major projects. Because average taxable homestead values declined, the current proposal would still reduce the average homeowner's City property-tax bill by approximately $54 compared with last year.

The tax rate, the tax bill, the City's existing debt, and the timing of new projects all have to be considered together. Saying "not this November" is not the same as saying "never." It is a decision to finish the work, define the need, and respect the other obligations already on residents' bills.

I want Pflugerville to build the facilities and infrastructure a growing city needs. I also want residents to know exactly what they are being asked to fund. When a future bond proposal comes forward, it should be specific, necessary, financially responsible, and ready for public scrutiny.

Related: review the City's Fiscal Year 2027 proposed budget and bond-election agenda item, see my priority on fiscal responsibility, or contact me with a budget question.

What I’ve done on this

I supported the decision not to call a November bond election. I reviewed the proposed projects in the context of work already underway, existing financial commitments, and the FY 2027 budget. I also supported continued planning for urgent needs such as a new animal shelter so Council can bring residents a defined scope, credible cost, and responsible implementation plan before asking for a vote.

Related priority: Fiscal Responsibility

← All Updates