A few people have asked what it's like to go from chairing the Planning & Zoning Commission to serving on City Council. The short answer: the work is related, but the responsibility is broader and heavier.
On P&Z, the question before you is usually narrow. Does an application meet the existing code? You apply standards, hear testimony, and make a recommendation. Council makes the final call.
On Council, you write the rules. You set the budget. You approve contracts. You hire and evaluate the City Manager. When something isn't working, you're not sending a recommendation up the chain. You're part of the body that has to fix it.
What carries over is the knowledge base. After serving on P&Z and the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee, I came into this seat with a working understanding of the Unified Development Code, the CIP process, infrastructure sequencing, and how development cases actually move through the system.
The other major difference is resident contact. Council members hear directly from people with questions about utility bills, drainage, traffic, parks, and development. That feedback changes how you evaluate agenda items, because you're hearing the lived impact, not just the staff summary.
Related: see my priorities for smart growth, read the housing and development FAQ, or contact me about a local development issue.
The biggest asset I brought into Council wasn't a title. It was a working understanding of how the city's growth process actually functions. Chairing Planning & Zoning and the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee meant I came in already familiar with the Unified Development Code, development review, impact fees that help fund growth-related infrastructure, infrastructure planning, and the gap that often exists between what policy says on paper and how it works in practice. That let me get to the substance faster, focused early on code friction, sequencing, and affordability, instead of spending months getting oriented.
Related priority: Smart Growth on Our Terms
← All Updates